Conduit
Get Started
Workflow automation

Conduit vs Zapier

Zapier is the universal connector. Conduit is the marketing platform. They're not direct competitors — but if you're using Zapier to glue marketing tools together, Conduit might let you delete the glue layer entirely.

Zapier is the gold standard for "connect any two apps". Marketing teams use Zapier to glue together Mailchimp + Smartlead + ManyChat + Apollo + Buffer + Calendly. Each Zap is $20-$40/mo at scale. Conduit collapses the glue: instead of Zapier between 8 tools, one platform with native logic.

Who's in the ring

Conduit

Native marketing platform with built-in Flow engine

Strength

Native modules don't need integration glue

Weakness

Only 15 native external integrations vs Zapier's 6,000+

Zapier

Universal app connector

Strength

6,000+ integrations; connect anything to anything

Weakness

Task-based pricing; gets expensive at marketing volume

Side-by-side breakdown

Pricing at 10K tasks/mo

Conduit Growth
$397/mo flat
Zapier Professional
$73.50/mo (10K tasks)

Pricing at 100K tasks/mo

Conduit Growth
$397/mo flat
Zapier Team
$598.50/mo

Marketing modules included

Conduit
Outreach, Inbox, Publisher, Enrichment, etc.
Zapier
None (glue only)

External integrations

Conduit
15 native + Webhook API
Zapier
6,000+

Real-time triggers

Conduit
Yes (webhook + internal events)
Zapier
Sub-second to 5 min depending on integration

Score

Conduit

88

Wins when the workflow is marketing-shaped. Limited general-purpose glue.

Zapier

85

Best at connecting anything. Costly at marketing volume.

Verdict

If your workflows are Slack + Notion + Linear + GitHub kind of glue, Zapier wins. If your workflows are "new lead comes in, send sequence, route to inbox, schedule post, update CRM" — Conduit collapses that into native logic and removes the per-task billing.

Try Conduit freeSee pricing

FAQ

Can I use Conduit and Zapier together?
Yes — Conduit's Webhook API works as a Zapier trigger and action. Use Zapier to connect Conduit to your accounting / project management tools; use Conduit-native logic for the marketing flows.
How does Conduit Flow Builder compare to Zapier's?
Both are node-based. Conduit's is opinionated about marketing primitives (trigger on DM, schedule post, send email, branch on contact field). Zapier's is generic (trigger on anything, action on anything).
Per-task vs flat pricing?
Zapier's task-based pricing means a single Flow that fires 1M times costs you $1M / 1K = $1,000 in tasks. Conduit's flat pricing is the same $397/mo regardless of how often the Flow fires.
Do I still need Zapier?
Probably yes — for connecting to accounting (QuickBooks), project tools (Asana / Linear / Notion), and edge integrations Conduit doesn't cover natively. But the volume drops dramatically when marketing moves into Conduit.
Migration from Zapier?
Audit your existing Zaps. Categorize into: marketing-flow (move to Conduit Flows), ops (keep on Zapier), edge integrations (keep on Zapier). Typical agency Zap stack collapses 60-70% into Conduit, leaving 30-40% in Zapier for true edge cases.
Webhook reliability?
Conduit webhook delivery: at-least-once, retries with exponential backoff up to 24 hours. Comparable to Zapier's.
Long-running automations?
Conduit Flows can span days/weeks (e.g. multi-touch sequences over 6 months). Zapier supports this via Delay + Paths but gets expensive past a few weeks.
Visual builder?
Conduit ships a drag-drop canvas. Zapier ships a step-list builder with branching. Different UX, similar capability.